 |
|
 |
|
- Readme First! -
Read and follow the rules, otherwise your posts will be closed |
|
|
|
|
|
There are currently, 289 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.
You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content. |
| | | | |
| No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register | | | | |
Re: Union Tap Beta 2 and raven's hackattempt (Score: 1)
by akis on Saturday, April 24 @ 10:34:20 CEST
(User Info | Send a Message) | zx, i don't know if you are not "ok" with raven or else, it is not my case this.
In forum post, sting combines hackalert with union tap beta 1 code. I can see that beta 2 code is different than 1.
i am not php coder, i know very little things about.
I just wondering if union tap beta 2 code can be included in hackalert code(as sting told for beta 1) and how.
Thanks :) |
| Parent | | | | |
Re: Union Tap Beta 2 and raven's hackattempt (Score: 1)
by inkydink1234 on Saturday, April 24 @ 11:03:00 CEST
(User Info | Send a Message) | So let me see if I understand correctly. In your previous article you slam Raven's script with this comment
"This is not valid, and actually Raven's script is breaking your users from using your site with per session cookies. That REQUEST_URI *IS VALID*. Its how phpBB works. I suggest you advise Raven to fix his code otherwise your users are unable to utilize per session only cookies."
And now you are saying it was not Raven's script?
If that is truly the case don't you feel an obligation to retract your earlier statement? And just for curiousity, why do you feel that he should include anything of yours in his script? Geez, it is so hard to follow your line of reasoning. |
| Parent | | | | | |
|